... what situation I'm describing.
A group of people is presented with almost insurmountably incriminating FACTS about a man over a period of months while the world watches on in anticipation. As the media circus plays out, those people go on to make a baffling choice that vindicates the man in spite of said facts. Am I talking about a presidential re-election or the "trial of the century"?
See what I did there? See? See?
Comments